Sunday, August 14, 2011

Richard Reiben, Keith Harris & Karl Immenhausen & Richard Lacroix

Harris, Reiben & Immenhausen are not answering questions about MVP & CETO- protecting Americans from nuclear & biological weapons smuggled into the USA by Al Queda terrorists.

MVP & CETO were marketed as companies mandated by the US Government to protect Ports & Stadiums from Al Queta bomb plots. nuclear & biological weapons smuggled into the US by terrorists.

Richard LaCroix represented himself as a Homeland Security mandated official, charged with finding the technology needed to equip shipping containers (CETO, LLC) and Stadiums (MVP, LLC).

LaCroix, a career con man, drunk and scam artist, acted as the front man for CETO & MVP.  He raised money, pretending to have a "Mandate" or special deal with the Department Homeland Security to find solutions to protect us from terrorists. He stated he was with Homeland Security to many people. Said he did a lot of dirty work for the CIA, black ops (Navy Seals)  in Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam etc....He claims to  be on directive from the White House..........

He stated he cannot be on any documents because of his revolving door policy with the White House & US Government. More recently, he states he has to get out of his house in the middle of the night because the terrorists are getting close to him and the US Govt moves him out in the middle of the night to save his life.....
Really good stuff...

So with Richard LaCroix running around different US Cities, scamming people, his attorneys, Reiben, Harris & Karl Immenhausen helped him perpetrate this con by providing what appears to be legitimate legal council.

Harris & Reiben seem to go back a long way with LaCroix. They have both been implicated in these scam companies LaCroix has used to execute his fraud. For Reiben & Harris to pretend that they don't know what LaCroix is doing out on the street is ludicrous. Here are some questions for Richard Reiben, Keith Harris & Karl Immenhausen:

1. How long have you known Richard LaCoix?
2. What companies, deals, actions have you been involved in with LaCroix or any company he used other names for?
3. What money can you account for in any of these companies?
4. What were your roles in his companies?
5. What legal actions civil suits, criminal actions  have you been implicated in?
6. Do you think Richard LaCroix is a legitimate business man?
7. Do you think Richard LaCroix is a crook?
8. Do you know any victims of Richard LaCroix over the last 30 years?
9. As offciers in MVP & CETO, can you verify the NFL "deal" for the MVP Tiger Cube?
10. Is it misrepresentation to notify investors of a company that binding agreement with Turner Private Networks for MVP is imminent when it was just a MOU ? I will sign an MOU with anybody today stating we will cooperate to find mutually beneficial business opportunities- Right now, with anybody-just send it to me and I will sign it. I will not however email possible investors that I have signed a "binding agreement" with Turner Private Networks in order to fool them about the scope of an agreement.
11. Was Turner told that MVP, LaCroix or Tiger Cube had a deal with the NFL to install betas of Tiger Cube?
12. Were any communications sent out to investors when Turner canceled the MOU? To whom? What did it say?
13. What evidence is there that there was a deal with the NFL. Page five of the MVP memorandum states a deal was made with the NFL....Where is the evidence for this?
14. Was Harris or Reiben involved with the Commerce Club, WARCO, First Metropolitan Mortgage?
15. Where did the money for capital calls go?
16. What monies were sent to LaCroix? How were they sent? Whose names were they sent to?
17. Have you ever told anyone that Richard LaCroix was with Homeland, The Govt etc....


I will stop here since I have many more questions and don't want to get into more areas that I already have answers to. I don't expect Reiben, Harris or Immenhausen to respond to these questions. They have really played the margins with LaCroix to help him. The time will come where they will have to answer these questions,  produce documents and detail their involvement with Richard LaCroix.

1 comment: